Title IX Is Not Solving The Problem Of College Sexual Assault (And Its Creating New Ones)

Jobs from Indeed

As a young man who graduated college about four years ago and who has a younger brother looking to attend in a couple of years, I cant help but pay attention to certain news pieces and topics surrounding college life. Lately, the Brock Turner case has been the one catching all of the medias attention, even though there are currently more than 300 similar Title IX investigations into colleges and universities across the U.S. While I understand the good intention, its these Title IX cases have me worried for my younger brother.

For those immediately unfamiliar with what it actually is, Title IX was passed as part of the Education Amendments of 1972 that states: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Title IX isnt bad, in my opinion. Its the reason Liz got to play football with us boys back in 8th grade–and why shouldnt she have? She was good at it, better than many of the boys, even.

The problems with this legislation really began to appear after the Obama administrations Office for Civil Rights (OCR), in an April, 2011 letter to institutions of higher education, called for colleges and universities to address sexual harassment and assaults as a requirement of Title IX. The letter states that the sexual harassment of students, including sexual violence, interferes with students right to receive an education free from discrimination and, in the case of sexual violence, is a crime. While inherently good in spirit, Title IX has often been criticized as ineffective for the overwhelming number of female victims it seeks to protect, and has spurred what many are calling overcorrection, leading to subverted due process and inevitable dismissal of any male accused, guilty or not.

For example, in the Title IX case of John Doe vs. Boston College, one male student was accused of walking by a female student on a school-sponsored casino boat event, lifting her skirt, and putting two fingers in her anus. Doe hired an attorney was proven via polygraph as well as surveillance and DNA forensics to be not guilty, and all criminal charges against him were dropped an erased from his record. Nevertheless, at the school level he was suspended, kicked off campus, stripped of due process, and found responsible of misconduct. He was suspended for two years, and left with a Suspended for Sexual Misconduct brand on his permanent transcript, something that every potential future employer of his will see. Jessica Denis, who mentions this incident in a piece for the Huffington Post, claims that she found 140 cases like the one described above. In one John Doe vs. CU Boulder, the victim, Jane Doe, admits having filed a false incident because she thought Doe was just another douchey frat dude.

That said, you cant ignore the problem that OCR set out to address in the first place with Title IX enforcement. The statistics show that 1 in 5 women will be sexually assaulted while in college, with some sources claiming that number is actually 1 in 4, though we tend to lend much more credibility to the former. Men are generally the perpetrators of these assaults, even if it is just 6% or 3% or whatever small percentage of the population that commits the majority of these crimes. We have a responsibility as men to think about the roles that we play as this story continues to unfold. We must be both understanding of the fact that this is , as well as cognizant of the need to protect ourselves against confused, sometimes malicious, false accusations that result in hearings without due process.

Theres an irony in all of this. I sat down to write this because I worry about my youngest brother becoming a John Doe vs. whichever college he decides to attend. I worry that some day, without any type of provocation, or perhaps because hes just another douchey frat dude that seems to deserve it, my brothers rights will be violated and hell become the victim of a kangaroo court.

The irony is that Id have already been worried about violations to my sibling were he a sister instead of a brother. Id be worried that some day, without any type of provocation, or perhaps because shes dressed and dancing provocatively, my sisters body would be violated and shed become the victim of sexual assault or rape. Its sort of an ignorance of privilege, one that I became more acutely aware of only when that privilege was shattered by Title IXs overcorrection.

As I began to dig further into the statistics, this whole overcorrection business became even more interesting. Not only do women make less than their collegiate male counterparts, only about 15% of university presidents are female at institutions that grant doctoral degrees, while only 25% of professors from the same pool were female. The very institutions that have both done a poor job of handling Title IX cases before and after this period of overcorrection have been primarily run by men. Take, for example, BYUs ridiculous honor code, which makes it possible for a woman who reports being raped to be suspended or expelled for violating said code. Not a very female-centric view on how to handle sexual assault, in my opinion.

The point is this: men definitely need to realize that campus sexual assault is a real thing, and they need to be very careful about how they approach women and engage in sexual conduct with them. Clarification and communication is the best way to not only protect yourself, but to make sure that youre protecting the best interests of the woman or man youre with. As odd as it may seem to ask for consent while youre both drunkenly taking off your clothes on your bed, getting naked with one another, nothing can be assumed anymore. Even if you get consent, Title IX may brush off that fact simply because youre the accused and the administration feels the need to react .

The only good thing that may possibly come of this is that collegiate males realize that they are increasingly in danger of persecution simply for being men and then realize that women have felt eclipsing amounts of danger all around the world for centuries. Title IX is doing much more harm than good, leaving others victims without the help they need, and creating new victims of its own. While the OCR issued their letters concerning Title IX with a legitimate intention to do good, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

As for my brother, the only thing I do is to make sure that hes informed before he heads off to college. Knowledge is the only thing that will keep him sexually responsible, and hopefully hell be a positive influence to other collegiate men. At the very least, his awareness may make his college campus a safer place for women–even if Title IX is making it more dangerous for everyone.

Read more: http://thoughtcatalog.com/andy-heikkila/2016/08/title-ix-is-not-solving-the-problem-of-college-sexual-assault-and-its-creating-new-ones/